The EU’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) has published a new report on achieving healthy, sustainable meals in public institutions.
The proposed criteria aim to promote healthier and more sustainable food options, whether prepared and served in the canteen, through catering, or in vending machines.
Though not binding, the criteria are intended to help national, regional, and local authorities across Europe to improve the sustainability of the food system.
It also intends to aid with the use of public procurement of food in a strategic manner to address environmental, social, including health and economic considerations.
The report includes best practices and tools inspired by an all-round concept of sustainability. It investigates environmental, social, economic and health aspects, including animal welfare and diets.
The environmental aspects build and expand on green public procurement criteria.
The proposed criteria cover organic farming, fair and ethical products; more sustainable fish; animal welfare; preventing food waste; and staff training.
Attention is given to sustainable agricultural practices and short supply chains, as well as to working conditions and the inclusion of vulnerable groups.
The newly developed criteria highlight the need, as recommended by nutritional guidelines at national levels, to shift to a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, nuts, and seeds, while reducing salt, free sugars, saturated fats, alcohol, and red and processed meat.
According to JRC, both the environment and people's health can benefit from such dietary changes.
Careful attention should be given to the target population of procurement contracts, including vulnerable people such as children, older adults, or hospitalised patients. Promoting age-specific adequate nutrition is key to preventing non-communicable diseases.
The proposed criteria are presented as a practical list covering different procurement needs for food, food services or vending machines.
This ensures flexibility for policymakers and contracting authorities, who can choose and implement the sustainable public procurement criteria that best fit their needs.
All criteria presented are coupled with verification mechanisms for compliance checks and monitoring, such as certification schemes and declarations.
Whenever possible, criteria are coupled with examples and best practices from real-world implementation of the sustainable public procurement criteria at national and local levels.
The report outlines supporting tools for implementation, such as a life-cycle assessment to evaluate environmental impacts; guidelines and strategies for nutritional criteria; and monitoring and evaluation.
It also covers market dialogue and stakeholder participation, as criteria must be supported by capacity-building, stakeholder engagement, and a supportive policy environment.