The European Union’s food safety system, though soundly based and respected globally, is overstretched in relation to chemical hazard protection, according to a new report from the European Court of Auditors.

The European Commission and the member states do not have the capacity to implement the system fully, the auditors say.

Guarantee

EU food safety policy aims to guarantee a high level of protection for human life and health, and to protect EU citizens from three types of hazards in food: physical; biological; and chemical. This audit concentrated on chemical hazards.

The legal framework governing chemicals in food, feed, and plants and live animals remains a work in progress, auditors say, and has not yet been implemented to the level envisaged in EU laws governing food production.

This affects the proper functioning of parts of the system and the sustainability of the model as a whole.

‘Inconsistencies’

“Food safety is a high priority for the EU; it affects all citizens and is closely linked to trade,” said Janusz Wojciechowski, the member of the European Court of Auditors responsible for the report.

“But the current EU system faces a number of inconsistencies and challenges,” he said.

Checks by public bodies can only ever make up a small proportion of all checks carried out, say the auditors, and the EU model can best remain credible if public and private-sector control systems complement each other.

However, synergies between the two have only just started to be explored, the report details.

Pesticides

The EU has limited the use of certain pesticides based on hazard criteria. Nevertheless, explain the auditors, residues of such pesticides may be tolerated in products imported into the EU if a risk assessment has shown that there is no risk to consumers.

The auditors also identified limitations in the control system as member states face difficulties in determining the nature of enforcement action in cases of non‐compliance.