‘I’ve been labelled ‘anti-farmer’ and ‘anti-rural’ for questioning Roundup’ – Harkin

Independent MEP Marian Harkin has hit back at critics for labelling her “anti-farmer” and “anti-rural” after raising concerns over the safety of controversial pesticide, glyphosate.

Yesterday, the best-selling weedkiller – and main ingredient of US agricultural giant Monsanto’s Roundup – was granted a new five-year European license, following almost two years of bitter debate in the European Union (EU).

A total of 18 of the EU’s 28 member states voted in favour of the extension; nine voted against; and one abstained.

Last month, Harkin – who represents the midlands/north-west constituency – voted in support of a recommendation to phase out glyphosate, commonly used by Irish farmers, over a five-year period.

Speaking to AgriLand, she said she has since been subjected to a serious backlash for pressing the issue.

Yet, she stands firm.

“There is a conflict in the science. I’ve read all the reports and I’ve gotten some very harsh remarks back in the media that I didn’t read the documentation; that I was led by the nose because it’s a citizens’ initiative,” she said.

That couldn’t be further from the truth. I’ve read all the reports; and the more I read, the more I am convinced that we need to start looking for alternatives.

Last month, the EU was presented with a petition with 1.3 million signatures calling for glyphosate to be banned. The campaign was triggered by a 2015 study from the World Health Organisation cancer agency, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which found that glyphosate was “probably carcinogenic”.

However, studies by international regulatory agencies – including the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – concluded that there is “little evidence” that the chemical causes cancer in people.

Re-authorisation

Yesterday, just two weeks after the European Commission failed to secure a majority, an EU appeal committee voted to re-authorise the sale and use of the substance for another five years.

It previously had a 15-year licence, which expired in June last year. An 18-month extension was granted to the license; however, it was due to expire on December 15.

It was feared that continued deadlock on the issue would spark a farmers’ revolt.

Harkin said: “If you go back to 2004, IARC was the first – and only agency – to say that second-hand cigarette smoke was carcinogenic. They went against the majority and there was uproar. The tobacco industry said ‘no, no, no’. Nowadays no-one smokes in the workplace.

“If you read the EFSA report, it’s not that they don’t have reports showing that glyphosate can have carcinogenic affects; it’s that, in the overall scheme of reports, there isn’t sufficient evidence.

“I have nothing against Monsanto; if they produce a pesticide that is safe to use, and that works, then happy days. But, I do have concerns for the people spraying it.

“Five years is a reasonable compromise, but we need to put pressure on companies to look at other avenues.

It seems to me that anybody who expresses concerns is labelled as ‘anti-rural’, ‘anti-farmer’, and basically as someone who doesn’t know what they are talking about.

“It took three meetings to get the five-year agreement; to me that is a very clear signal to the makers of glyphosate that they need to start looking for alternatives,” she concluded.

Comments

Please be considerate of others when commenting. All comments posted are subject to our commenting policy. Comments violating this policy will be removed without notice.