Active farmer definitions are on a ‘collision course’ rural law expert warns
The writing is on the wall for conacre tax reliefs, one of Northern Ireland’s leading agricultural law experts warned farmers at a business planning seminar.
Speaking at the Farm Family Key Skills meeting at Loughry College, chairman of the Agricultural Law Association for Northern Ireland Peter Brown warned farmers it was likely the UK would follow Ireland’s lead on agricultural tax reliefs.
Code for ‘no financial incentives’
He said: “Landlord farmers – or ‘slipper farmers’ as the Scottish Government likes to call them – are probably going to lose agricultural property relief on their ground in the near future.
“If it wasn’t a Westminster matter, this would have likely been gone long ago.”
Brown said there were “very strong hints” in a Government-commissioned report published in Northern Ireland.
He said: “In John Gilliland’s ‘Sustainable Land Use’ report they talk about financial incentive for long leases. I think that’s just code for ‘No financial incentives for conacre lettings any more’.
Active farmer definitions
“The revenue’s definition of active farmer is slightly different [from the department’s].
They are using the same term to mean two slightly different things – but they are on a collision course so the two are going to merge.
“So I imagine at some point in the future in order to get agricultural property relief you’re going to have to be active enough to also, by coincidence, be getting any area-based payments – but who knows how long they will last beyond 2020, but they are starting to come together.
Farm inheritance tax cases
“The difficulty is that the revenue’s term is more elastic. The revenue’s term is not set out in legislation but it’s determined by the cases that it picks.
“So what happens is that you have a graph; you’ve a fixed point which is “McClean” [a conacre-related case which the court ruled against] which is bad for farmers and you’ve a fixed point which is “Balfour” which is not so bad and “Allen” which is not so bad. But you can’t necessarily draw a straight line between these cases; there’s a big grey area.
Shades of grey
The department would have you believe that the case for active farmers is black and white and that there’s a very thin grey area which is the panel is there to deal with. The revenue’s grey area is slightly wider.
The only safe thing you can do is to stay out of the grey area because you don’t know whether you’re dark grey or light grey until the tribunal tells you.
In the McClean conacre case in 2009 the court ruled in favour of HM Revenue and Customs – which claimed that agricultural land let in conacre should now be subject to inheritance tax.
“When Mrs. McClean died, under the rules which existed at that time, the McCleans would have thought they would have been fine,” Brown said.
“They subsequently found out they had a £2.5 million inheritance tax bill to pay.
“And that is the problem – you don’t want to be the case that finds out you’re actually darker grey than you thought you were.”